RPO vs Staffing: Which is Better For Growth Hiring

RPO vs Staffing

Attracting new talent to keep your business or company growing is not always easy, but thankfully, there’s the option to use expert help.

RPO and traditional staffing are among the main methods that companies use to fill their talent gaps, but which one works better for growth hiring? Stick around to find out:

What is RPO?

RPO is short for ‘Resource Process Outsourcing’. It’s a recruitment model where a business delegates part of, or the entire recruitment process to an external provider.

Among the major benefits of this model is that RPO recruiting is the best way to hire at scale, thus optimizing your resources. Additionally, taking this hiring approach makes it easier to drive productivity and efficiency, while guaranteeing better quality of hire with enjoyable candidate experiences.

What is staffing?

Staffing is a more traditional recruitment model where agencies typically focus on filling open positions quickly. The companies that offer this service maintain a large applicant database that makes it easier to find appropriate candidates to fill role gaps rapidly.

The main problem with this model is that the staffing agencies focus more on fast replacements rather than quality replacements since they are paid for every hire they make.

What’s growth hiring?

Growth hiring is not a hiring solution, rather it’s a hiring strategy where companies focus on long-term results that are aligned with their mission and vision.

So, which is the better model for growth hiring?

You know, now, that traditional staffing aims to fill positions faster while RPO aims to keep filling any open positions with high-quality candidates that align with the goals of your company.

That being the case, RPO recruiting should be your go-to hiring solution whenever your objective is high-growth hiring. As long as you find a top-quality RPO provider, you will enjoy a long-term collaboration that will lead to a higher quality of hires over a long period.

What should be your deciding factors?

The differences between RPO recruiting and traditional staffing make each model more suitable in the right setting. Here are the deciding factors to consider:

1. Scope of hiring

RPO uses a more comprehensive approach that goes beyond just filling positions. If you’re looking for a comprehensive hiring solution that will scale with your company, then RPO will work best.

On the other hand, traditional staffing is a perfect solution when you need temporary talent to meet the requirements of a particular project.

2. Duration of engagement

RPO recruiting providers are with your company for the long haul. So if you’re looking for a recruitment provider who will understand the goals of your company and align the recruitment model to these goals, then RPO will work for you.

Conversely, traditional staffing is best when you don’t need an agency to be part of your company. A good example is when there’s a lot of work to be completed fast, yet you’re short-staffed.

3. Customizability & scalability

RPO works perfectly for companies that often scale their hiring volumes, whether up or down, depending on business needs and seasons. It’s also easier to customize so that services are tailored to the needs, values, and culture of a company.

Traditional staffing isn’t the best for customizable hiring strategies, and since it’s typically used on a sudden basis, it’s only applicable for rapid scalability situations.

There you have it.

RPO is the better solution for growth hiring and can improve the performance of your business over a long period.

When you hire leading companies like Kinetix, you can expect top-notch RPO services that are aimed at helping your company reach its ultimate potential. The results you get make the investment worth the effort.